matthiasm wrote:
> I'd do the UTF-8 merge entirely by itself and have a version out for  
> testing for quite a while before touching anything else. This is far  
> too intrusive to just slap it in together with some other changes.

        Ya, my concerns as well.
        UTF8 really does touch a lotta stuff, in the diffs that I've done.

        However, as intrusive as it is, it's well implemented IMHO.
        The trick is making sure all new code added since 1.1.6 takes
        into account utf8 needs.

        Okzid did a great job, and seemed to have a keen eye for what
        to modify to merge in utf8.

        Trouble spots probably include the HTML widget, which has undergone
        some heavy changes since 1.1.6, so that might need some special
        attention during the utf8 port.

        I have some japanese UTF8 files here I use for testing.. it's a
        good way to test UTF8, because of it's fonts being so different,
        it's easy to spot problems with common problem areas, like
        alignment/cursor positioning/highlighting/wordwrap, etc.

_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk

Reply via email to