MacArthur, Ian (SELEX) (UK) wrote: > >> As long as we're breaking the abi, would this be a good time >> to also bring over the abi bugs/rfe's not applied to 1.1.x, >> or is that biting off too much? eg: > > For my money, if we are going to break the ABI with the utf8 stuff, we > might as well break it properly... > > Like, I'd really like to see the win32 winsock switched to winsock2...
+1 FWIW, I'd like to drop support for Windows 95/98/Me and add support for Windows CE/Windows Embedded (which only provide Unicode APIs) and Windows Vista (which drops support for some older APIs like winsock...) -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com Internet Printing and Publishing Software http://www.easysw.com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
