imm wrote: > On 29 May 2007, at 19:00, matthiasm wrote: >> On May 29, 2007, at 3:57 PM, Michael Sweet wrote: >>> MacArthur, Ian (SELEX) (UK) wrote: >>>> Like, I'd really like to see the win32 winsock switched to >>>> winsock2... >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> FWIW, I'd like to drop support for Windows 95/98/Me and add support >>> for Windows CE/Windows Embedded (which only provide Unicode APIs) >>> and Windows Vista (which drops support for some older APIs like >>> winsock...) >> >> +1 on both. You will not be able to drag me into buying Vista yet, >> though. > > Sounds good to me. But I did find a win95B install disk in the cupboard > at the weekend... > winCE sounds interesting though. > > Also, I don't know anybody that actually has a vista box, although I see > plenty in the shops - anybody got one? What are they like to program on? > And what do they have instead of winsock, i.e. is it still BSD socket > compatible? If not, how am I going to port my networking code over?
No, they have winsock2, just not the original winsock. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Michael Sweet, Easy Software Products mike at easysw dot com Internet Printing and Publishing Software http://www.easysw.com _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
