imm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Aaron, you have a "workaround" for GL fonts with XFT on linux?
Er, actually, I just fall back on the "fixed" core font, same as current upstream FLTK. I *do* hack fl_font_xft.cxx to include fl_font_x.cxx with all the symbols renamed (via preprocessor directives), but a second look revealed that I do so merely to address an unrelated problem affecting programs that inadvertently mixed Xft 1 and Xft 2. (At the time, several ITK/VTK apps triggered this, thanks in part to VTK's wholesale inclusion[!] of Xft 1.) > Also, have you looked at the experimental workaround I put in the > fltk118-utf8 patch? How does that compare, does it work OK for you, > or what changes does it need? Not yet, sorry; I'll try to find time to check it out, but that probably won't be until this weekend at best. > Anyway, if there's a perceived need for this in the XFT builds, I'll > try and find some time to work up a better version, and maybe a patch > for the mainline 1.1.8 build too. Thanks! -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info. _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
