Sanel Zukan wrote: > > For those who have not a chance to look at the recent osnews.com comments > regarding to this acqusition, here is the interested one: > http://www.osnews.com/permalink?298056 >
A more interesting comment about fltk (one of the two negative ones) is this one: "Sadly true. fltk is on life support barely above abandonware levels. Currently what kills fltk as a useable toolkit is it's inability to gracefullly handle automatic relayout due to language/locale changes. Not to mention that the api in many places feels like an amateuristic hack. It could be tempting to take the fltk code base and actually make something out of it, though." -- Gonzalo Garramuño [EMAIL PROTECTED] AMD4400 - ASUS48N-E GeForce7300GT Xubuntu Gutsy _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
