On 14.04.2008, at 11:33, fabien wrote: >> I use Jason Bryan's FLU tree widget a fair bit - but I don't know how >> appropriate that is for our needs now. > Functionally, FLU is attracting, but from my fltk2 experience, > especially on tree browsers of many kinds, > I would'nt recommend such a piece of code (at least as it is today), > I wouldn't recommend fltk2 tree browser impl either for another > reason : > imho, the original maarteen de boer impl. is quite aging now with > hard limitations when you dive into it (like terrible markers > managements, tree walking side effects (including side effects to > selection, etc...) > I think I could help in that field, > I think i could even provide a model which support better node search > when heavy load, etc..,
Sounds great to me. I always though of the Tree Browser (and the Pulldwon menus) as just some specialised Fl_Scroll. Because the tree functionality itself is already implemented as Fl_Group and Fl_Widget. This has the benefit that no code is duplicated, and that functions, like walking the tree, would become available for all FLTK widget trees. I am looking forward to reading your implementation ideas. Matthias ---- http://robowerk.com/ _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
