Albrecht Schlosser wrote:
> Very good, sorted by STR# is fine.
>
> I don't know how much work this has been - would it be possible for you to do
> the
> same with all *open* FLTK 1.2 STRs ?
Sure -- it's a fairly simple perl script to generate the concatenated
STRs.
> I'll be one of them.
Great -- it's possible the searches I did for ABI and "binary compat'
found most if not all of the items that should be revisited, but I
guess a manual pass wouldn't hurt.
> I'd like to take 50 STRs and see what I can do. I'd suggest that others would
> also take a certain number of STRs, so that we can start working, as we like.
> If there are still STRs to check, when someone is done with her/his list,
> then
> s/he could take another 50 STRs.
> Gimme a range of 50 STRs, and I'll start working ...
Sure; take the last 50; 1100 on to the End.
(I figure the last STRs are the most relevant, so we'll start at the
end)
I'll keep a list at the top of the document (just updated)
for the range assignments.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
