On 26.02.2010, at 17:56, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > Am 26.02.2010 17:10, Matthias Melcher wrote: >> >> What is the current status of the CMake environment for 1.3? Does it need >> patching or does it work as is? > > Hmm, short question, but not easy to answer. I just built on Linux > (Ubuntu 9.04, "old" glibc, using -G "Unix Makefiles"), and this > worked okay with all defaults. I think that it would also work > with the newer glibc versions, because I added the tests, and my > tests with Fedora 11 also worked. > > But ... > > there are lots of things to do if we want to support CMake: > > - add some "configure" options > - OSX support supposedly doesn't work yet > - building IDE's may or may not work > - maybe much more ...
OK, I see. > Why are you asking? Do you also want to write the CMake files with > fluid? Yes. I think that the most important build environment that we need would be covered by VisualC, Xcode, and of course makefile. But I also know that CMake is often requested. So if it is in an OK state, I would add it soon. If it is still weak, I would rather wait, because every change that goes into the CMake environment also must be copied into Fluid then. Similar questions arise for CodeBlocks, Anjuta, BorlandC and whatever else is out there. Would we increase the user base sufficiently to put this effort in? At least maintenance is then quite low with the auto-generated files. - Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
