On 27.02.2010, at 00:24, Albrecht Schlosser wrote: > However, I have doubts concerning CMake :-( because CMake is > something that can change rapidly. It's more like autoconf/configure > than a static IDE. Recently we had to add some tests to detect > the new glibc headers (scandir), and there are lots of files > that contain some programming code in "CMake language" (just > like configure.in) or even c/c++ code for the tests. ... > > Please don't understand me wrong. I don't want to say that the > fluid approach is wrong, but we should probably concentrate on > the file list part only for CMake. And maybe this part could be > done, whether the rest of the CMake files is ready or not :-)
Yes, that is probably the best way. I was hoping that Fluid could one day generate the IDE for new FLTK-based projects that are not part of the FLTK library setup itself, so users can rapidly start a new project. But for now, an update of the source file lists and targets should be sufficient. I really do not want to write another build system here that takes all possible Linux distros, build environments, and IDEs into account ;-) - Matthias _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
