On 02/08/12 13:42, Ian MacArthur wrote:
> Yes, I think so, +1 for adding to test folder, after folk have looked it
> over.
> Though fltk headers might be awkward given the provenance of the original
> material?
Mm, what's the original license?
We should probably preserve it if possible.
There was some discussion of relicensing the examples,
because theoretically we want people to be able to start
with an example and rewrite it into a commercial app
without being encumbered by the GPL/LGPL. (Example code
and library code should probably be licensed differently)
I think Mike came back with a recommendation for a BSD style
license (?) or some such for our example progs. I think it
was within the last year (2011) we discussed this stuff
on one of the groups, probably fltk.dev.
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
