On 17/04/2012 11:21, Matthias Melcher wrote: > Both is possible. I started with Parallels on an old Laptop, running > 3 VWs, but that did not work as I was running out of RAM in no time > (thanks to Windows 7 and OSX). I two four really old Siemens machines > with 64 bit AMD's, and they'll get Ubuntu and XP. The Mac laptop will > do the OS X builds, and that is pretty much it.
OK - sounds good. What triggers the builds? I don't know how this stuff all works... I imagine the build system polls the svn repo (how often? Every half hour or so? faster, slower?) and if anything has changed since the last check, it updates its images then triggers a make? Is it like that? Or does it trigger off any svn change? I guess what I'm thinking about is that I might commit a few small but possibly related changes, close together in time - I wouldn't want each one to trigger a rebuild sequence, I guess I'd want it to wait until several changes were in and I'd stopped messing about, then do the rebuild. Also, what toolcahins are you planning on supporting? I guess that a command line is easier, so OSX via the Makefile is easier than Xcode? (I always use the Makefile anyway, but I know you use Xcode some.) Though I guess xcode-build (or whatever the command is...) works for automating the CLI on OSX? Ditto for VS I guess - the shell is easier to automate than invoking the IDE? Though I favour mingw on WinXX anyway! >> On the ubuntu front, though I've always been a big fan, I'm >> starting to swing back to Fedora or Debian more these days - >> ubuntu's use of Unity& the way they leave all sorts of "standard" >> stuff out of the base install irritates me... > > Yes, I was pretty shocked how dumbed-down the interface is. It feels > like a painted OS X on Valium. I always liked Ubuntu for its seamless > upgrades, but I may have made a bad choice here. Then again, after > finding the Terminal (took me 15 minutes at least), I was back in > Unix world and set up the web server in no time. Yes - once you get past how different Unity is, it all works fine. But... you know, it is different... (Though I do wonder if we could extend Fl_Sys_Menu_Bar to support the Unity menu bar model? Though I took at cursory look at this and got bogged down real fast.) > I am very excited about Jenkins so far. The initial setup was so easy > that I am still not sure if I did anything at all. But Jenkins has > already done a few builds of FLTK 1.3 for Ubuntu, and I can click and > see all the statistics, warnings, errors, just as I planned. Sounds great! _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
