On 4 Aug 2012, at 14:06, Matthias Melcher wrote: > > On 04.08.2012, at 14:15, Ian MacArthur <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Oh yes - me too! I'd love that. >> Not sure Apple will go for it though > > > App Store Review Guidelines from 2010, excerpt. I believe they went more > strict, but I don;t have dev access anymore... .
Nor I... I guess things like phoneGap and os forth get away with it because they are "just" html, whereas we'd be drawing widgets ourselves, so that would not be accepted... > > My example would be running on Android. Android requires apps to be in Java > (up until Android 4, IIRC), but Java can call native libraries. A minimal > Java app would provide the four interfaces discussed above, and the FLTK app > would be wrapped together with FLTK itself inside a native library, called > from Java. > > In true FLTK fashion, the app programmer would never touch a single line of > Java code. The same would work for iOS, or PalmOS, or PocketWindows, or > whatever else is out there. OK... Though I imagine Apple would still reject it anyway. On the webOs front, I guess the PDK could be leveraged to build fltk "native" on the phone, maybe... >> <OT> >> In other news - I recently acquired a brand new, still in the retail >> packaging, been sitting in a warehouse for over a year, Palm (aka HP) Pre3: >> >> Matt, any chance of an Einstein port, then? ;-) > > If you can run FLTK on it, you can run Einstein ;-P . Sure, if I can run FLTK... the crunch here being whether or not I can be bothered to do the porting work, rather than just having it magically appear... I'm thinking maybe not, not right now... Cheers to all, -- Ian _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
