On 02/20/13 10:50, Michael Baeuerle wrote: > I'm not a C++ expert, is it possible to overload the function > declaration without breaking other things?
Options I can think of:
o Protect the newer declaration with the FLTK_ABI_VERSION macro
o Name the conflicting function something else
_______________________________________________
fltk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
