> > Uploaded as STR #2931. > > Thanks. Somebody with a Windows machine should verify the code.
Yes, I did; at least on WinXP. Built and ran fine. I guess the only issue would be if someone was "secretly" using fl_scandir() directly in their own code and got caught out by the prototype being made more strict, but that might count as a self-inflicted injury? Other than that, I guess we need to verify it on a few more systems - e.g. OSX before and after the 10.8 transition where they made their scandir() prototype more POSIX compliant. (I only have access to 10.6 these days...) I guess most Linuxes will be fine, though have not checked; what systems have you tested on? Also, maybe need to get you to assign the copyright of scandir_posix.c to the fltk project? Not sure how that is handled, actually... > > Not sure what to do about a password reset - presumably your account > > is still active since your email posts are making it to the list > > OK though! > > I don't use the mailing list, I read and post via USENET (feed from > news.easysw.com). No account seems to be required to do that, probably > because spammers no longer know what USENET is. Ha, yeah, that sounds right... ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
