> So I'm going to learn FLTK 1.3.2 stable ;) Probably a good choice: what you learn from that ought to be directly applicable to the fltk3 branch anyway. We hope!
> Or is it better to take FLTK 1.3.x weekly snapshot (more stable?) ? :-D Probably not much in it: we strive to ensure that the commits (and hence the weeklies) are as stable as possible, but the weeklies (indeed the svn tree itself) will not be as well tested as the stables tarballs. > And good luck to FLTK 3.x. FLTK is very cool, and with a good theming > in future, I think it is going to be very popular. Theming is a very > important thing to the psych of the users and only this can make a real > boom of users and more FLTK-Linux-Applications...and perhaps Desktop > Environments ;) Though note that desktop environments, as we currently know them, look increasingly like an evolutionary dead-end. Most of the widget metaphors we use make very little sense in a touch-based setting, so ultimately we need to think about how to "embrace" a more touch-centric usage. This is made more awkward by the closed nature of the dominant touch GUI's (translation: Apple will usually not let you ship apps written using other toolkits...) ******************************************************************** This email and any attachments are confidential to the intended recipient and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete it from your system and notify the sender. You should not copy it or use it for any purpose nor disclose or distribute its contents to any other person. ******************************************************************** _______________________________________________ fltk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.easysw.com/mailman/listinfo/fltk
