Yes I definitely think FNH needs this, the proposed API looks fine.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Dente <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I made a comment on Twitter today that turned into a conversation with
> James, and I figured it would be good to throw it out to the
> discussion group and get other people's opinions.
>
> My comment was that I find it unnecessarily onerous to configure FNHib
> AutoMapping to exclude mapping of an entity base class (layer
> supertype). Currently you need to tweak the automapping conventions
> using something like
>
> AutoMap.AssemblyOf<Entity>()
> .Setup(s =>
> {
> s.IsBaseType =
> type => type == typeof(Entity);
> })
> .Where(t => t.Namespace == "Entities");
>
> But it seems to me this is going to be SUCH a common case that it
> should just be drop-dead simple to configure this directly on the
> automapper. James seemed amenable, and threw up a pastie of a couple
> of options:
> http://pastie.org/587733
>
> I pointed out that the API already uses the term Ignore elsewhere, so
> sticking with that probably makes sense. Personally, I think I prefer
> the .IgnoreBase<>() option.
>
> What do other people think? Any of those look good? Have better
> options?
> >
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
