Further, IgnoreBase also has a Type non-generic parameter overload that you
can use to specify open generic types.
You can now do IgnoreBase(typeof(EntityBase<>)) instead of this:

.Setup(x => x.IsBaseType = type => type.IsGenericType &&
type.GetGenericTypeDefinition() == typeof(EntityBase<>));

:)

On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 12:53 PM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:

> Latest binaries now have IgnoreBase<T>, and ForTypesThatDeriveFrom<T> is
> now Override<T> in keeping with the overrides 
> concept<http://wiki.fluentnhibernate.org/Auto_mapping#Overrides>
> .
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 8:47 AM, James Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> I agree. IgnoreBase is good for me.
>> Unless I hear some objections in the next 8 hours, I'll implement this
>> when I get home tonight.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Paul Batum <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Yes I definitely think FNH needs this, the proposed API looks fine.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Dente <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> I made a comment on Twitter today that turned into a conversation with
>>>> James, and I figured it would be good to throw it out to the
>>>> discussion group and get other people's opinions.
>>>>
>>>> My comment was that I find it unnecessarily onerous to configure FNHib
>>>> AutoMapping to exclude mapping of an entity base class (layer
>>>> supertype). Currently you need to tweak the automapping conventions
>>>> using something like
>>>>
>>>> AutoMap.AssemblyOf<Entity>()
>>>>  .Setup(s =>
>>>>  {
>>>>    s.IsBaseType =
>>>>      type => type == typeof(Entity);
>>>>  })
>>>>  .Where(t => t.Namespace == "Entities");
>>>>
>>>> But it seems to me this is going to be SUCH a common case that it
>>>> should just be drop-dead simple to configure this directly on the
>>>> automapper. James seemed amenable, and threw up a pastie of a couple
>>>> of options:
>>>> http://pastie.org/587733
>>>>
>>>> I pointed out that the API already uses the term Ignore elsewhere, so
>>>> sticking with that probably makes sense.  Personally, I think I prefer
>>>> the .IgnoreBase<>() option.
>>>>
>>>> What do other people think? Any of those look good? Have better
>>>> options?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> >>>
>>>
>>
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Fluent NHibernate" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to