I agree. IgnoreBase is good for me. Unless I hear some objections in the next 8 hours, I'll implement this when I get home tonight.
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 5:16 AM, Paul Batum <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes I definitely think FNH needs this, the proposed API looks fine. > > > On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Kevin Dente <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> I made a comment on Twitter today that turned into a conversation with >> James, and I figured it would be good to throw it out to the >> discussion group and get other people's opinions. >> >> My comment was that I find it unnecessarily onerous to configure FNHib >> AutoMapping to exclude mapping of an entity base class (layer >> supertype). Currently you need to tweak the automapping conventions >> using something like >> >> AutoMap.AssemblyOf<Entity>() >> .Setup(s => >> { >> s.IsBaseType = >> type => type == typeof(Entity); >> }) >> .Where(t => t.Namespace == "Entities"); >> >> But it seems to me this is going to be SUCH a common case that it >> should just be drop-dead simple to configure this directly on the >> automapper. James seemed amenable, and threw up a pastie of a couple >> of options: >> http://pastie.org/587733 >> >> I pointed out that the API already uses the term Ignore elsewhere, so >> sticking with that probably makes sense. Personally, I think I prefer >> the .IgnoreBase<>() option. >> >> What do other people think? Any of those look good? Have better >> options? >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Fluent NHibernate" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/fluent-nhibernate?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
