Hi Alistair, It would be interesting if you could also work on the FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for the user testing.
We should also have a new version for FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle and FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work on it after creating the 3 new artifact pages. About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version currently at the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly). Thanks!! Tona On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the wireframes, and they > really look much better with actual contents. > > I send you some comments below (in red): > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Hi James and Tona and all, >> >> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem Ipsum >> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design. Since I was >> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be >> safe, so you should see everything there. >> > > Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are > corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions. > >> >> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon" in >> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we have >> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with something? >> > > We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea if you > would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task, please > tell me. > >> >> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still some >> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are ready for >> the user tests. Much of it will involve some level of coordinating >> the wireframes with the evaluation plan. For example, I still need to >> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able to view, >> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation plan. >> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock solid yet, >> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still quite >> welcome. >> > > I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing protocol during > this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should revise the > wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap. > >> >> Other minor things that I thought of are... >> >> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this? Should there >> be no "me" comments when the user begins? >> > > Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me" comment. > But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that the > user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could be > interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the participant > after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really > understands it. Do you agree? > >> >> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view. Should I do >> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of the >> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually expanded >> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the >> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be overkill. I >> hope I didn't lose you with that question. >> > > We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and > another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to have a > interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it be > technically feasible for this mockups' testing version? > >> >> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page. Does that just show >> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on that day? >> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text with "Today >> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button should >> be Today's Events instead of Events. >> > > It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it shows > tomorrow's or the nearest future's events. > >> >> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the "Exhibition" >> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that. Shouldn't all they need >> to know be the running time? Or are they able to download to download >> those items to their hard drive. >> > > Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll assimilate the design > of this section to the design we have on the artifact's page for the video > and audio panel. > >> >> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my email! I'd >> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any thoughts you >> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our evaluation >> plan. >> >> Cheers, >> Alistair >> _______________________________________________________ >> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] >> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work >> > > > > -- Tona Monjo Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design http://www.tonamonjo.com
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
