Hi Tona, I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you have started already?) I was wondering if you needed anything else in the User Ready wireframes. Let me know if I can do anything to help! See you tonight in the design meeting
Alistair On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Alistair, > > It would be interesting if you could also work on the > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for the user > testing. > > We should also have a new version for FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle and > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work on it after > creating the 3 new artifact pages. > > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version currently at > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly). > > Thanks!! > > Tona > > > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi Alistair, >> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the wireframes, and >> they really look much better with actual contents. >> >> I send you some comments below (in red): >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi James and Tona and all, >>> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem Ipsum >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design. Since I was >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be >>> safe, so you should see everything there. >> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions. >>> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon" in >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we have >>> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with something? >> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea if you >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task, please >> tell me. >>> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still some >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are ready for >>> the user tests. Much of it will involve some level of coordinating >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan. For example, I still need to >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able to view, >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation plan. >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock solid yet, >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still quite >>> welcome. >> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing protocol during >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should revise the >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap. >>> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are... >>> >>> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this? Should there >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins? >> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me" comment. >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that the >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could be >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the participant >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really >> understands it. Do you agree? >>> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view. Should I do >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of the >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually expanded >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the >>> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be overkill. I >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question. >> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to have a >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it be >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version? >>> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page. Does that just show >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on that day? >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text with "Today >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button should >>> be Today's Events instead of Events. >> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it shows >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events. >>> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the "Exhibition" >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that. Shouldn't all they need >>> to know be the running time? Or are they able to download to download >>> those items to their hard drive. >> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll assimilate the >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's page for the >> video and audio panel. >>> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my email! I'd >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any thoughts you >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our evaluation >>> plan. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Alistair >>> _______________________________________________________ >>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work >> >> >> > > > > -- > Tona Monjo > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design > http://www.tonamonjo.com > _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
