James or Jess, I've another question: when doing user tests here, in Barcelona, do we also have to make the user sign the *Contributor License Agreement*?
Thanks! Tona On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, tona monjo <[email protected]> wrote: > James, preparing the documentation for tomorrow's test, I wonder if you > have used any picture of artifact with label and object code. If you > haven't, I will prepare one. > > Thanks! > > Tona > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:26 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi Alistair, > > > > Thanks for your interest! I'm going to do two user testing tomorrow (at > our 3PM), and I'm printing today the wireframes to prepare it. I think they > are complete, but if I detect anything or do some change, I'll tell you. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Tona > > > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 10:36 AM, Alistair Jones <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Tona, > >> > >> I'm not sure when you will be doing your user testing (perhaps you > >> have started already?) I was wondering if you needed anything else in > >> the User Ready wireframes. Let me know if I can do anything to help! > >> See you tonight in the design meeting > >> > >> Alistair > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 12:10 PM, tona monjo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > Hi Alistair, > >> > > >> > It would be interesting if you could also work on the > >> > FEM_Exhibitions.graffle, because it's included on the tasks for the > user > >> > testing. > >> > > >> > We should also have a new version for FEM_VisitorsAlsoEnjoyed.graffle > and > >> > FEM_RelatedObjects.graffle, but surely you're planning to work on it > after > >> > creating the 3 new artifact pages. > >> > > >> > About the FEM_MyCollection.graffle, I cannot open the version > currently at > >> > the SVN. Could you review it? (maybe it has uploaded wrongly). > >> > > >> > Thanks!! > >> > > >> > Tona > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 11:43 AM, tona monjo <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Alistair, > >> >> > >> >> Great work! I've had a look at the new versions of the wireframes, > and > >> >> they really look much better with actual contents. > >> >> > >> >> I send you some comments below (in red): > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:12 PM, Alistair Jones <[email protected] > > > >> >> wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> Hi James and Tona and all, > >> >>> > >> >>> I've been working on replacing all the thumbnails and the Lorem > Ipsum > >> >>> text for all the mobile wireframes from the last design. Since I > was > >> >>> a rookie with OmniGraffle, I duplicated a lot of the canvases to be > >> >>> safe, so you should see everything there. > >> >> > >> >> Ok, I will review all the canvases to be sure that the new ones are > >> >> corrent, and then I'll remove the old versions. > >> >>> > >> >>> Everything is replaced except for home screen, where it says "icon" > in > >> >>> place of the exhibitions, collections, code entry etc. Do we have > >> >>> icons for those some where? Should I try to come up with something? > >> >> > >> >> We have no icons for these options by now. It would be a good idea if > you > >> >> would try to find something, but if you need some help in this task, > please > >> >> tell me. > >> >>> > >> >>> So all the Lorem Ipsum text is replaced, but there are still some > >> >>> things that will need to be done before these wireframes are ready > for > >> >>> the user tests. Much of it will involve some level of coordinating > >> >>> the wireframes with the evaluation plan. For example, I still need > to > >> >>> create 3 or so artifact pages that the tester's will be able to > view, > >> >>> and I'll do that after I take a closer look at the evaluation plan. > >> >>> Plus I know the evaluation plan is well-along, but not rock solid > yet, > >> >>> so everyone's thoughts they had over the weekend are still quite > >> >>> welcome. > >> >> > >> >> I agree with you. We are working in depth in the testing protocol > during > >> >> this week, so when the all tasks will be defined, we should revise > the > >> >> wireframes to ensure that there isn't any gap. > >> >>> > >> >>> Other minor things that I thought of are... > >> >>> > >> >>> ...the "me" in the comments. How will we handle this? Should there > >> >>> be no "me" comments when the user begins? > >> >> > >> >> Yes, the first time the user enters, he shouldn't see any "me" > comment. > >> >> But in the context of the user testing, I think we could assume that > the > >> >> user has sent some comment before. From my point of view, it could be > >> >> interesting to keep this icon, and to inquiry about it to the > participant > >> >> after finishing the tasks related to comments, to know if he really > >> >> understands it. Do you agree? > >> >>> > >> >>> ...about the expanding description in the artifact view. Should I > do > >> >>> one set of the artifact pages with description collapsed + each of > the > >> >>> subsections (comments, audio video, tags, etc) individually expanded > >> >>> and than another set with the description expanded + each of the > >> >>> subsections individually expanded. Perhaps that would be overkill. > I > >> >>> hope I didn't lose you with that question. > >> >> > >> >> We may have a version of the page with all the panels collapsed, and > >> >> another version with all expanded. Then we may cut these panels, to > have a > >> >> interactive version where the panels can collapse/expand. Could it be > >> >> technically feasible for this mockups' testing version? > >> >>> > >> >>> ...the "Events" section on the "Exhibition" Page. Does that just > show > >> >>> the next single event? or all the events on that will be on that > day? > >> >>> If the latter is true, we'd have a lot of unnecessary text with > "Today > >> >>> at 10:00", "Today at 11:15" and maybe it should be the button should > >> >>> be Today's Events instead of Events. > >> >> > >> >> It shows next events, so when there are no events today, it shows > >> >> tomorrow's or the nearest future's events. > >> >>> > >> >>> ...the file size of the audio and video files on the "Exhibition" > >> >>> Page. I didn't know the rational behind that. Shouldn't all they > need > >> >>> to know be the running time? Or are they able to download to > download > >> >>> those items to their hard drive. > >> >> > >> >> Good remark! I'll remove the file size note, and I'll assimilate the > >> >> design of this section to the design we have on the artifact's page > for the > >> >> video and audio panel. > >> >>> > >> >>> Well that about does it. Thanks for making it through my email! I'd > >> >>> love to hear your feedback on those questions and any thoughts you > >> >>> have about coordinating the wireframes to work with our evaluation > >> >>> plan. > >> >>> > >> >>> Cheers, > >> >>> Alistair > >> >>> _______________________________________________________ > >> >>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > >> >>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > >> >>> see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Tona Monjo > >> > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design > >> > http://www.tonamonjo.com > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > > Tona Monjo > > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design > > http://www.tonamonjo.com > > > > -- > Tona Monjo > Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design > http://www.tonamonjo.com > -- Tona Monjo Disseny d'interficies | Diseño de interfaces | Interface design http://www.tonamonjo.com
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://fluidproject.org/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
