Hi Michelle, In general it sounds like a reasonable and logical approach. I have two concerns though.
1) Outside of release testing, the manual tests are largely overlooked, so it is likely that if anything does go wrong, it will be a while before it is noticed. 2) Full and Full with Preview are actual versions of UIO that we ship; which makes it a bit strange that we wouldn't have an actual demo for them. Thanks Justin On 2013-04-16, at 10:49 AM, Dana Ayotte <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Michelle, > That sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks for clarifying. > Dana > > On 2013-04-16, at 10:41 AM, Michelle D'Souza wrote: > >> >> >> >> >> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> From: Michelle D'Souza <[email protected]> >>> Subject: Re: Full page UIO >>> Date: 15 April, 2013 4:33:50 PM EDT >>> To: "Vass, Joanna" <[email protected]> >>> Cc: Fluid-Work Mailing List Work <[email protected]> >>> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> I'm pulling this thread back to the beginning to try to get a little more >>> clarity on next steps. It seems to me that we need to decide what to do >>> with the current full page demo and we also need to move forward on the >>> PMT. >>> >>> As Joanna mentioned, the issue with the current full page demo is that it >>> does not show an implementation that we recommend. Our demos are one of the >>> main ways that our users learn how to use Infusion and build >>> implementations by example. By keeping this demo around in its current >>> state, we send the incorrect message that we expect people to use the full >>> page UIO on their websites. >>> >>> I propose that we do the following: >>> >>> 1. Move the full page demo into the manual tests and get the demo branch >>> into master (Heidi & Jon) >>> 2. Design a PMT inspired demo (Joanna & Dana) >>> This probably looks like a pared down version of the current mockups: >>> >>> http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/%28C4A%29+Preference+Management+Tool+Mockups >>> 3. Build the PMT demo >>> >>> Does this seem reasonable? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Michelle >>> >>> >>> >>> On 2013-04-09, at 12:01 PM, Vass, Joanna wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> Last week Jon, Michelle and I had a quick conversation about the full page >>>> UIO configuration in the demo and I want to hear everyone else's thoughts. >>>> A worry I had with including it in the demo is that it might suggest that >>>> it is a recommended implementation for a website. A full page >>>> configuration could be appropriate for the PMT, where the modifications >>>> would apply not just to one website but to all applications and an >>>> accurate preview would be difficult to represent. However, the current >>>> presentation of the full page doesn't quite reflect this use. Maybe we >>>> could mockup something that better shows this or explore other >>>> configurations that show the flexibility of UIO on a website? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Joanna >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________________ >>>> fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] >>>> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, >>>> see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work >>> >> > > _______________________________________________________ > fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] > To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, > see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
