If the full page demos are kept as manual tests, the styling would still need tweaking for them to not look broken/make sense (as the preferences use the same markup templates fat panel uses) which makes me think, if they look okay, would they still not be worth demoing?
h. On 2013-04-16, at 10:56 AM, Justin Obara wrote: Hi Michelle, In general it sounds like a reasonable and logical approach. I have two concerns though. 1) Outside of release testing, the manual tests are largely overlooked, so it is likely that if anything does go wrong, it will be a while before it is noticed. 2) Full and Full with Preview are actual versions of UIO that we ship; which makes it a bit strange that we wouldn't have an actual demo for them. Thanks Justin On 2013-04-16, at 10:49 AM, Dana Ayotte <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Hi Michelle, That sounds like a good plan to me. Thanks for clarifying. Dana On 2013-04-16, at 10:41 AM, Michelle D'Souza wrote: Begin forwarded message: From: Michelle D'Souza <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Subject: Re: Full page UIO Date: 15 April, 2013 4:33:50 PM EDT To: "Vass, Joanna" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Cc: Fluid-Work Mailing List Work <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Hi everyone, I'm pulling this thread back to the beginning to try to get a little more clarity on next steps. It seems to me that we need to decide what to do with the current full page demo and we also need to move forward on the PMT. As Joanna mentioned, the issue with the current full page demo is that it does not show an implementation that we recommend. Our demos are one of the main ways that our users learn how to use Infusion and build implementations by example. By keeping this demo around in its current state, we send the incorrect message that we expect people to use the full page UIO on their websites. I propose that we do the following: 1. Move the full page demo into the manual tests and get the demo branch into master (Heidi & Jon) 2. Design a PMT inspired demo (Joanna & Dana) This probably looks like a pared down version of the current mockups: http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/%28C4A%29+Preference+Management+Tool+Mockups 3. Build the PMT demo Does this seem reasonable? Thanks, Michelle On 2013-04-09, at 12:01 PM, Vass, Joanna wrote: Hi All, Last week Jon, Michelle and I had a quick conversation about the full page UIO configuration in the demo and I want to hear everyone else's thoughts. A worry I had with including it in the demo is that it might suggest that it is a recommended implementation for a website. A full page configuration could be appropriate for the PMT<http://wiki.fluidproject.org/display/fluid/(C4A)+Preference+Management+Tool+Mockups>, where the modifications would apply not just to one website but to all applications and an accurate preview would be difficult to represent. However, the current presentation of the full page doesn't quite reflect this use. Maybe we could mockup something that better shows this or explore other configurations that show the flexibility of UIO on a website? Thanks, Joanna _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work _______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
