I'm fine with that as long as we make sure to get to the new demo soon. I'd hate for this to linger for a long time. If we keep it in our iteration plans we should be okay.
Thanks Justin On 2013-04-16, at 12:29 PM, Michelle D'Souza <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks, Justin. I've replied inline below. > > Michelle > > > > > On 2013-04-16, at 10:56 AM, Justin Obara wrote: > >> Hi Michelle, >> >> In general it sounds like a reasonable and logical approach. I have two >> concerns though. >> >> 1) Outside of release testing, the manual tests are largely overlooked, so >> it is likely that if anything does go wrong, it will be a while before it is >> noticed. >> > > > I agree that this has been a problem for us. I think that we'll need to be > more careful in the short term while we are pushing forward on UIO. Once we > have full page demos that we are happy to showcase, we'll remove this manual > test. > > >> 2) Full and Full with Preview are actual versions of UIO that we ship; which >> makes it a bit strange that we wouldn't have an actual demo for them. >> > > I completely agree with this and I think the plan would be to make a full > page demo soon that will replace the manual test. > >
_______________________________________________________ fluid-work mailing list - [email protected] To unsubscribe, change settings or access archives, see http://lists.idrc.ocad.ca/mailman/listinfo/fluid-work
