> Of course cover art is just a contingent aspect of music, but it's beloved. > It has been a source of richness. Is it necessary? Of course not. Does its > belovedness matter? It ought to-- > > And virtual imagery doesn't show the marks of time. Nothing like cardboard > scuffed around the edges and unevenly faded for beauty-- > > Mortality is for me a key component of the beautiful. I agree with you 100%. It has it's place but it shouldn't be cause to adversely affect the appreciation of the music underlying it. That's just a side-effect of having grown up in a time where everybody else has does it something so frequently that for most it has become unthinkable to ever go against that norm. Music with no accompanying artwork. Hmmm... Didn't The Beatles attempt that once? Myke
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Bertrand et Claudia CLAVEZ
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Heiko Recktenwald
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Ann Klefstad
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Ann Klefstad
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Heiko Recktenwald
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Lord Hasenpfeffer
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Lord Hasenpfeffer
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Heiko Recktenwald
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Lord Hasenpfeffer
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Bertrand et Claudia CLAVEZ
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Lord Hasenpfeffer
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Patricia
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Heiko Recktenwald
- RE: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Villani, Adam
- RE: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Carol Starr
- RE: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Villani, Adam
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Eryk Salvaggio
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Reed Altemus
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Patricia
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts Reed Altemus
- Re: FLUXLIST: Recent posts narvis & ...pez

