I suppose what we could do would be to list the cast of characters
(including an abuser and an abusee) and have all who wanted to play submit
their names to the fluxlist, with a deadline, then Roger could put each set
of names for each character into the container of his choice and choose.
At 10:26 AM 06/23/2000 -0700, you wrote:
>Good point, Roger, since Mr. Triple Asterisk is in absentia and not able to
>choose counsel. Would the abusee be random or come forth and ask to be
>abused? Would we know the real identity of the fictitious character,
>'cause if we just had a bunch of people jumping on the bandwagon and
>becoming fictitious abusers, abusing whomever, things could get pretty
>vicious. Trying to control random acts of abuse would be like herding
>cats. Maybe it should be fluxilysilly abuse by fluxfictitious character.
>
>At 05:50 PM 06/23/2000 +0100, you wrote:
>>maybe a fictitious character should enter the list and abuse someone
>>
>>then we can have a proper fictional trial
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
