The Madawg said, "The appealing idea is that Fluxus is inclusive. Artists
spend most of their careers being rejected which is why Fluxus is so
refreshing--"
I'm solidly behind the Dawg on this one
(metaphorically - wouldn't want him to get all excited
and start humping my leg)
Maybe we need to simplify rather than
complicate.
How about:
If you know what Fluxus was, then you know what Fluxus
is.
If you know what Fluxus is, and you think that you are it,
then you are.
?
Allan
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2005 9:47 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: FLUXLIST: FLUXUS AND THE PLASTIC ARTS
In a message dated 5/15/05 3:34:16 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
i still think we have to work on defining/redefining fluxus, at least to get a Fluxlist definition of Fluxus.
I think what makes Fluxus so dynamic and interesting to me is that there is no definition- I wish people would just accept that. The appealing idea is that Fluxus is inclusive. Artists spend most of their careers being rejected which is why Fluxus is so refreshing--or should I just go be a Neoist?? Dawg
