On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 11:18 +0100, gabor papp wrote: > hi all, > > i find the fluxus interpolation functions are a bit illogical: > > (define a #(1 2 3)) > (define b #(4 5 6)) > (vlerp a b 0) -> #(4 5 6) > (vlerp a b 1) -> #(1 2 3) > > while the expected output would be: > (vlerp a b 0) -> #(1 2 3) > (vlerp a b 1) -> #(4 5 6) > > the same applies to (lerp), (mlerp) and (vlerp-tangent) probably. > > is there any opposition against changing their behaviour to the expected > one?
No, looks like another twisted dave maths messup. Probably explains a lot of (- t)'s going on in plant eyes where I was using a lot of this. cheers, dave
