Is (vlerp v1 v2 f) essentially the same thing as (vmix v1 v2 f)?
yes, it's the same. actually mlerp is also the same, since most of the
vector operations now support any vector size.

Do I also notice correctly that now the order of the input vectors
for vmix is reversed from what they were with 0 being "crossfader to
the left" and 1 being "crossfader to the right"?
correct. now the order is more logical.

That bit confused me in the past but I assumed it was some sort of GL
or Scheme tradition so I didn't complain about it.
let us know if you encounter these kinds of confusing things.

gabor

Reply via email to