I think that MRFCleaner allows per-feature tolerances. Maybe think of it as how much a particular feature is allowed to move, rather a rule that both features have to match?
Jason -----Original Message----- From: mark2atsafe Subject: [fme] Re: Set different value for snapping tolerance into the loop True, but to defend the Safe point of view, with a group-based transformer there's no real point getting the value from a feature, because each feature could be different. EG - if you have two lines 1m apart, would you snap them if one had a tolerance of 1.5m, but the other had 0.5m? For insights into what's up at Safe Software and what's on the development horizon, visit Safe's blog at spatial-etl.blogspot.com. Love FME? Then open your diary to March 6-7, 2008 and write this... "Second Worldwide FME User Conference - Must Attend!" See http://www.safe.com/company/fmeuc2008/index.php for more details. Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fme/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fme/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
