Le 22 nov. 07 à 18:25, Michael Haupt a écrit :
The trick is dirty because I have to bind a variable to the result
of a rule evaluation and then re-bind it to something entirely
different. That's not what I consider clean code.
I still don't understand why you had to do that.
I really like the description of the hierarchy between C < objects
< functions. However, is this order the only one ? I originally
thought
there were no such hierarchy, so that objects can use functions,
as much as functions use objects. Does it mean that ST style of
programming can not be applied to COLA, if
ever this question make sense ?
I don't fully understand what you mean.
Ok, maybe it's because your tutorial is about peg, not the entire
"fonc/idst" project. The way I saw it, I thought that this project
could be the base on which the next "squeak" would be built on.
But if you have the order function > object > C, then you can't
express "programs" as a soup of objects (the ST way).
Stéphane Conversy
Enseignant Chercheur en IHM - ENAC
http://lii-enac.fr/~conversy
enac: +33 5 62 17 40 19
dgac r&d: +33 5 62 25 96 48
_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
