Hi

Does anyone know if an open toolchain is available for any FPGA series?

I think Xilinx's open bitstream experiments began and ended with the 62* series, when they acquired the small firm Algotronix. 62* series is rather old too. I believe some of their newer devices offer "partial reconfiguration" : http://tinyurl.com/yqk6c4 . This works a bit like memory overlays in certain machines.

Generally FPGA vendors are protective of their bitstream formats and this precludes the possibility of open (and self-hosting) software -> hardware translators.

Of course if you don't mind having a proprietary bit of software in the loop then many experiments are possible. JBits is probably as close as one can get for now: http://tinyurl.com/2fehf6

Open Cores project is a good place to track the open state of the art: www.opencores.org

Closed Bitstream Sadness here

http://xwt.org/thoughts/bitstream.secrecy.html
http://www.tuxdeluxe.org/node/204

One day, hopefully one day...

Toby


On 27 Nov 2007, at 16:34, Antoine van Gelder wrote:

Ian Piumarta wrote:
Several of us here (at VPRI) are interested in the potential of better synergy between hardware and software. Something we'd love to see is the *OLA back-end generating netlists for FPGAs, or better still reprogramming them on the fly (which I'm told is possible, but I've yet to see an example). Just-in-time software deserves just-in-time hardware, no? ;-)

Was looking at FPGA's a month or two ago asking questions about reconfigurability and clockless computing and apparently the Xilinx 62* series of FPGAs are not only capable of being rewritten on the fly but - even better - you can reprogram only a subset of the gates if you want!

Also looks intriguing: http://www.falvotech.com/blog/index.php?/ archives/200-Forth-Day-Report.html

- a

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to