Hi, I am comparing different approaches to generate/write Smalltalk VMs. As part of this study I ran the famous tinyBenchmarks on different Squeak VMs:
Original Squeak VM: 544391281 bytecodes/sec; 16103777 sends/sec PyPy Squeak VM: 33212247 bytecodes/sec; 1856922 sends/sec Dan's Java VM: 19962570 bytescodes/sec; 1162878 sends/sec Sqvm: 3270645 bytescodes/sec; 149550 sends/sec The result of sqvm surprised me, I expected it to be much faster. Is this result reasonable? Did I do something wrong when compiling and running sqvm? I took the version from http://piumarta.com/pepsi/idst-20070830.tar.gz, as the one in the SVN repository doesn't compile on OS X. Cheers, Lukas -- Lukas Renggli http://www.lukas-renggli.ch _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
