On 13/02/2008, Lukas Renggli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thank you all for you insights. > > > At one level, you could imagine to take a method body in Squeak and > > compile it in the same manner. That would bring it to the ball park > > of Squeak, at least. You could put better method caching at call > > sites (possibly different ones based on some analysis), it would make > > it faster than Squeak. > > Are there any plans to build such a Squeak VM? > I think, better to ask, is there plains to build VM using jolt compiler, because idst having limits, because it's still backed by GCC.
> Lukas > -- Best regards, Igor Stasenko AKA sig. _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
