On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Michael FIG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think I'm gradually being sold on using git, even though Mercurial > seems friendlier it just doesn't have the same momentum behind it. I > also just discovered Guilt, the git equivalent of Mercurial Queues, > and it looks like it works even better (allows separate patch stacks > for separate branches in the repository).
It would be great if you just tried github.com and see if you like it. I'm thinking: setup one branch just as a clean mirror of svn (via git-svn) and fork that as a working repo (I think such 2-repo setup is needed for good git-svn operation but I might be wrong since my git-fu is still weak). I would be much more likely to play with that than with your existing mercurial repo (the effor of learning mercurial and sharing my changes with others would be non-trivial). I would do it myself, since it doesn't take much time, but clearly you're the right person to maintain "official" fork of idst. You can also do the same on repo.or.cz and gitorius and see which you like the best. -- kjk _______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
