Hasn't that emerged as a key characteristic of biological evolution - the alternation between new "parts" (molecules), increasingly complex combinations of those parts, encapsulation of successful combinations into new parts (pathways, cells, tissues, organs, systems), etc., wash, rinse repeat?

For that matter, it's certainly how we build systems: components -> subsystems -> systems -> systems of systems -> ecosystems......

Miles Fidelman

Paul Homer wrote:
I wouldn't describe complexity as a problem, but rather an attribute of the universe we exist in, effecting everything from how we organize our societies to how the various solar systems interact with each other.

Each time you conquer the current complexity, your approach adds to it. Eventually all that conquering needs to be conquered itself ...


Paul.

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    *From:* Loup Vaillant <[email protected]>
    *To:* [email protected]
    *Sent:* Friday, June 15, 2012 1:54:04 PM
    *Subject:* Re: [fonc] The Web Will Die When OOP Dies

    Paul Homer wrote:
    > It is far more than obvious that OO opened the door to allow massive
    > systems. Theoretically they were possible before, but it gave us
    a way
    > to manage the complexity of these beasts. Still, like all
    technologies,
    > it comes with a built-in 'threshold' that imposes a limit on
    what we can
    > build. If we are too exceed that, then I think we are in the
    hunt for
    > the next philosophy and as Zed points out the ramification of
    finding it
    > will cause yet another technological wave to overtake the last one.

    I find that a bit depressing: if each tool that tackle complexity
    better than the previous ones lead us to increase complexity (just
    because we can), we're kinda doomed.

    Can't we recognized complexity as a problem, instead of an unavoidable
    law of nature?  Thank goodness we have STEPS project to shed some
    light.

    Loup.
    _______________________________________________
    fonc mailing list
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc




_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc


--
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to