Actually that's your reasoning. Years ago when I was in college, educators wrote that innovation for innovation's sake is worth nothing. Truly worthwhile inventions judging by percent of Nobel Prize awards are by Jews, hence in Hebrew. But until the world converts to their superior culture, inventions are best communicated to the world in English since automatic machine translation is frequently imperfect.
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 05/04/2013, at 7:19 AM, Kirk Fraser <[email protected]> wrote: > > The main source of invention is not "math wins" as described on > http://www.vpri.org/html/work/ifnct.htm since the world would be speaking > math if it were really the source of inspiring more inventions that improve > the world's standard of living. Math helps add precision to tasks that > involve counting. Attempting to move from counting to logic such as in > statistics sometimes leads to false conclusions, especially if logic is not > given priority over the tools of math. For human value, readability is > required, so computer language improvements must focus on natural language. > > > Your assumptive base is incorrect. You're assuming because "all the world > speaks english" english has won in terms of being the main source of > innovation. That's not correct reasoning. > > Julian > > _______________________________________________ > fonc mailing list > [email protected] > http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc > > -- Kirk W. Fraser http://freetom.info/TrueChurch - Replace the fraud churches with the true church. http://congressionalbiblestudy.org - Fix America by first fixing its Christian foundation. http://freetom.info - Example of False Justice common in America
_______________________________________________ fonc mailing list [email protected] http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
