The fact that we're not communicating very effectively disproves your point. ;-)

Julian

On 06/04/2013, at 12:42 AM, Kirk Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:

> Actually that's your reasoning.  Years ago when I was in college, educators 
> wrote that innovation for innovation's sake is worth nothing.  Truly 
> worthwhile inventions judging by percent of Nobel Prize awards are by Jews, 
> hence in Hebrew.  But until the world converts to their superior culture, 
> inventions are best communicated to the world in English since automatic 
> machine translation is frequently imperfect.
> 
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 2:19 AM, Julian Leviston <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On 05/04/2013, at 7:19 AM, Kirk Fraser <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> The main source of invention is not "math wins" as described on 
>> http://www.vpri.org/html/work/ifnct.htm since the world would be speaking 
>> math if it were really the source of inspiring more inventions that improve 
>> the world's standard of living.  Math helps add precision to tasks that 
>> involve counting.  Attempting to move from counting to logic such as in 
>> statistics sometimes leads to false conclusions, especially if logic is not 
>> given priority over the tools of math.  For human value, readability is 
>> required, so computer language improvements must focus on natural language. 
> 
> Your assumptive base is incorrect. You're assuming because "all the world 
> speaks english" english has won in terms of being the main source of 
> innovation. That's not correct reasoning.
> 
> Julian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Kirk W. Fraser
> http://freetom.info/TrueChurch - Replace the fraud churches with the true 
> church.
> http://congressionalbiblestudy.org - Fix America by first fixing its 
> Christian foundation.
> http://freetom.info - Example of False Justice common in America
> _______________________________________________
> fonc mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

_______________________________________________
fonc mailing list
[email protected]
http://vpri.org/mailman/listinfo/fonc

Reply via email to