https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1753295
--- Comment #16 from Artem S. Tashkinov <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Adam Williamson from comment #15) > what is the actual purpose of this bug report, since this was an intentional > upstream change whose effect was known and accepted? what does the reporter > expect to happen before the report is CLOSED? * Proper support for bitmaps fonts in F31 maybe? No? It's been fixed and you don't need to use COPR's, various utilities, etc? * A Pango downgrade maybe? * Respect towards the users who can't live without bitmap fonts maybe? * A fix maybe since as of now you can't use bitmap fonts in F31 unless you 1) know how to search for/file bugs 2) know how to use various utilities outlined here 3) not be afraid to do all of the above Again, F31 has been released with BROKEN BITMAP FONTS SUPPORT which many would consider a major feature of a desktop operating system. I don't understand your stance/comment but this whole Pango debacle looks like a deliberate attempt to alienate even more users. But then Gnome 3 has been exactly that (we don't need users) from the very beginning. Oh and KDE5 closely follows. XFCE so far has remained the only sane featureful DE in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _______________________________________________ fonts-bugs mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
