James Crippen wrote: > > From http://www.unlambda.com/~james/XFree86/CID-fonts/cmap-xlfd.txt > > CMap Character Set Encoding Notes > ------------------ -------------------- --------------- ----------------------- > RKSJ-H/V JIS X 0208-1990 Shift-JIS HW JIS-Roman @ 1B
According to Lunde's book, RKSJ stands for Roman, (half-width) Kana and Shift-JIS. This means that it also has single-byte half-width Katakana in it. The Roman and half-width Kana are from JIS X 0201-1976. > UniJIS-UCS2-H/V ISO 10646-1:2000 UCS2 P Latin in ASCII range Is it really all of ISO 10646-1:2000? Or just the JIS X 020[18] character sets, in UCS-2 encoding? > Hankaku - - HW Latin & hiragana & > katakana @ 1B Are you sure there are Hiragana in there? > Hiragana - - HW hiragana @ 1B Half-width Hiragana? Seems unlikely to me. > CMap XLFD CHARSET_REGISTRY XLFD CHARSET_ENCODING > ------------------ ----------------------- ----------------------- > H/V JISX0208.1983 0 > H/V JISX0208.1990 0 The JISX0208.19xx fonts in the X world are normally only used for horizontal layout. You would probably need to use some other XLFD field for the vertical fonts (or just skip those for now). > RKSJ-H/V JISX0208.1983 0 I may be misunderstanding the machinery that you are going to use, but if you are going to use the encoding as is, then RKSJ is definitely not the same as JISX0208.1983. RKSJ is in Shift-JIS encoding. Or does the machinery take care of transcoding from JISX0208.1983-0 to RKSJ? > EUC-H/V JISX0208.1983 0 EUC has the 8th bit on both bytes set to one, so it is JISX0208.1983-1, which is deprecated, so you might want to just skip this one. > UniJIS-UTF8-H/V ISO10646 1 UTF8 is not the same as ISO10646-1. > The JIS X 0212-1990 > standard does not include Latin glyphs. It does contain accented Latin characters, but I don't know whether the Adobe fonts contain glyphs for those. Erik _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
