Markus Kuhn wrote: > > Keith Packard wrote on 2002-06-04 16:08 UTC: > > At the font level, I can use the Type1 tables to map names to Unicode > > codepoints for fonts which don't yet support Unicode 3.2 mappings for the > > new entries. [...] I need to unify the Adobe glyph names with the > > MathML glyphs and the Unicode 3.2 spec. > > Keith, > > Before you start this, you might want to get in touch with > > Eric Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > who is now in charge of > > Unicode and Glyph Names > http://partners.adobe.com/asn/developer/type/unicodegn.html > > and (from what I heared) about to revise the entire thing to add the > Unicode 3.2 mappings for many of the glyphs that were so far mapped into > the Adobe Corporate Use Area. In case he has already a draft of that, it > might save both you and the Mozilla MathML people some (guess)work. > > As a first step towards this: Attached is my patch to update > > http://www.unicode.org/Public/MAPPINGS/VENDORS/ADOBE/symbol.txt > > for Unicode 3.2, in case that's of any help.
I have filed the following bug about this migration: http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152610 Not all PUA values have been eliminated in Unicode 3.2, e.g., the following entry is still there: 0xBD 0xF8E6 # VERTICAL ARROW EXTENDER --- RBS _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
