Around 20 o'clock on Jun 4, "James H. Cloos Jr." wrote:
> Probably not. The (postscript versions of the) interesting math fonts > I beleive all predate adobe's glyph naming recomendations. (At least > for the TeX-related ones; I cannot speak definitively on mozilla's > other set of recomended math fonts (by bitstream for corel, yes?).) Of the 231 unique glyph names in the blue sky math fonts, 66 are not represented in glyphnames.txt. THat's better than I feared. I think what I can do is allow multiple glyphname->Unicode mapping files in the format of the glyphlist.txt and manually build a separate transcoding file for the glyph names not present in the standard file. fontconfig already unifies multiple encoding tables into a single unicode mapping function -- many fonts have incomplete Unicode maps which must be suplemented from the apple roman map. Adding character names just extends that function. That allows me to get from Unicode 3.2 codepoints to glyphs; now I need to get from the mozilla PUA codepoints to Unicode 3.2 codepoints. A definitive list of the PUA codepoints that are used would be very useful here. Keith Packard XFree86 Core Team HP Cambridge Research Lab _______________________________________________ Fonts mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/fonts
