On Monday 30 July 2001 21:38, you wrote:

> It's also a bit unfortunate that Mark's patch isn't yet commited. Anyone
> volunteer for this? It's just too big for me.

I see in ViewCVS that everything looks OK, and I managed to 'cvs update' one 
file as a test, but I can't 'cvs checkout' at the moment. Anyone else having 
this problem?

Yeah, I'd like to get that patch in, too, before doing up this next release.

> Here's what I did with it:
> I applied the patch to the code before formatting it.
> It seems like it has been some changes in the repository after you created
> the patch. The following files was rejected:
>
> src/org/apache/fop/fo/flow/Block.java
> src/org/apache/fop/layout/AreaTree.java
> src/org/apache/fop/layout/Page.java
> src/org/apache/fop/tools/TestConverter.java

If I can figure out exactly what it is you did, and restore my 'cvs 
checkout', I can take care of 3 of these. They were affected by marker 
support, basically. Shouldn't conflict with Mark's changes, in a logical 
sense,  but 'patch' might not think so.

> The rest of the files made it. So, I applied codeformatting and license
> changing to those files and created a new patch which is attached to this
> mail. That patch consists of the following files:
>
[ List of files ]

OK, I'm not sure I understand 100%. The current CVS does _not_ reflect Mark's 
patch at all, and you have a patch which applies a portion of Mark's patch, 
to the _formatted_ codebase. Is that correct? And it is then a question of 
applying the rest of the patch to Block, AreaTree, Page, and TestConverter, 
right? Just trying to get my head straight. :-)

Regards,
Arved

P.S. Thanks for the yeoman effort.

-- 
Fairly Senior Software Type
e-plicity (http://www.e-plicity.com)
Halifax, Nova Scotia
Wireless * B2B * J2EE * XML

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to