Peter B. West wrote: > Victor, > > I noticed from your commt that the 'country-name's had lost their > spaces, e.g., MACEDONIA,THEFORMERYUGOSLAVREPUBLICOF. > > I don't know whether this was in the original, but it certainly reads > awkwardly.
I am pretty sure that the contents of the files didn't get changed. I'll resurrect the fop4.xsd file for a minute to make sure that is true. > fop.xsd also includes 2-letter language codes. However, the 3-letter > language codes are the ones we need. They have terminology and > bibliographic variants (the terminology variant is normative for XSL) > which occasionally differ. Many languages have the legacy 639-1 > 2-letter as well, and it is useful to keep them about the place, as they > are frequently used, e.g. en_US. See ISO 639-2T, ISO 639-2B, ISO 639-1 > <http://www.loc.gov/standards/iso639-2/> > > In conf/xml-lang.xml (under tag FOP_0-20-0_Alt-Design, naturally) I have > included these variants as optional attributes in the language entries. > E.g. the following consecutive entries: > > <language terminology="zho" bibliographic="chi" iso639-1="zh" > EnglishName="Chinese" > FrenchName="chinois"/> > <language terminology="chk" > EnglishName="Chuukese" > FrenchName="chuuk"/> > > fop.xsd has no "script" entries. xml-lang.xml contains script codes > according to the latest version of the ISO 15924 draft that I could find. Since my only purpose here is to get a stable URL for the FAQ, I don't intend right now to dive into the content. However, for those who want to, it should be a little clearer now in which file to do that. Victor Mote --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
