:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in the trunk.
On 19.12.2002 18:11:02 Oleg Tkachenko wrote: > Hello there! > > I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in > the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement. > It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course > it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should I > commit it to the branch codebase? I'm inclining to implement it in a clean way > in the trunk instead of extending/patching the branch. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
