Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Jeremias,:-) Ok, you're sentenced to implement the same functionality in the trunk. I'm -0 for the inclusion in the branch as it sends the wrong message IMO. But I'm looking forward to seeing bidi support in action in the trunk.
I would encourage Oleg to bring this functionality into HEAD. If it already exists in Oleg's working copy of the maint branch (for reasons which have frequently been canvassed here), I think it would be churlish of us to deny access to our faithful band of users.
So, fop-0_20_2-maintain +0.
Peter
On 19.12.2002 18:11:02 Oleg Tkachenko wrote:Hello there!
I know, shame on me, shame on me, but I've implemented partial bidi support in the branch. Sorry, it was urgent commercial requirement.
It seems to be working ok (QA is still verifying it though), but of course it's a patch actually and I don't like it much. My question is: should I commit it to the branch codebase? I'm inclining to implement it in a clean way in the trunk instead of extending/patching the branch.
-- Peter B. West [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.powerup.com.au/~pbwest/ "Lord, to whom shall we go?" --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
