On Thu, 2002-12-19 at 21:15, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > All cool, but how exactly is that better than having a PDF template that > is stitched behind or in front of the FOP result using iText or PJ? > Works well. Ok, PDF reading with our own library is a bonus as is better > XML output for debugging. But I don't see any immediate need for this at > the moment given our limited resources. Or do I miss anything?
Well I'm not really suggesting is is high priority, just an idea. One things is that the XML and the additions can work both in and out of Fop. At least outputing SAX in the XMLRenderer would probably be an improvement. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
