Shouldn't we be leery of "render options" where one specifies properties of how the output should look outside of what is specified by the XSL-FO file?
PDF encryption? Printer options? Text encoding? MIF version?
(If there are output properties that cannot be specified sufficiently by XSL-FO 1.0, well, that's what FOP extensions or XSL-FO 2.0 would be for, correct?)
I don't think the WG will accept output format specific stuff in the FO source. I personally don't think this is a good idea either.
J.Pietschmann
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
