On 01.07.2003 06:46:52 Glen Mazza wrote:
> --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 
> > What about instream-foreign objects that get passed
> > through? SVG is the only
> > one I know of, and it is hard-wired in already, but
> > I'm not sure that this
> > capability should be lightly tossed. 
> Agreed.  But do dynamically added ElementMappings
> actually work, i.e., can we actually attach an 
> ElementMapping to FOP without changing FOP code?

We can. Have a look at mathml and plan in the examples directory. I've
started another one for krysalis-barcode.

I'm not quite ready to throw that functionality out. Keiron has done a
pretty good job improving the element extension facility in the redesign.
It's a lot better than the stuff in the maintenance branch which I'm
currently fighting with. So consider it a -0.5 for now (!) to remove the
dynamic addition of extensions.  For moving the code I'm +1.

Jeremias Maerki

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to