On 01.07.2003 06:46:52 Glen Mazza wrote: > --- Victor Mote <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What about instream-foreign objects that get passed > > through? SVG is the only > > one I know of, and it is hard-wired in already, but > > I'm not sure that this > > capability should be lightly tossed. > > Agreed. But do dynamically added ElementMappings > actually work, i.e., can we actually attach an > ElementMapping to FOP without changing FOP code?
We can. Have a look at mathml and plan in the examples directory. I've started another one for krysalis-barcode. I'm not quite ready to throw that functionality out. Keiron has done a pretty good job improving the element extension facility in the redesign. It's a lot better than the stuff in the maintenance branch which I'm currently fighting with. So consider it a -0.5 for now (!) to remove the dynamic addition of extensions. For moving the code I'm +1. Jeremias Maerki --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
