>M. Sean Gilligan wrote: >>Is there any interest in accepting this change? > >Yes.
Great! > >Commonly a patch should be submitted as an enhancment >request in bugzilla, Bug #21380 has the patch for the 0_20_2-maintain branch Bug #21381 has the patch for the HEAD branch I hope I did everything correctly. Let me know if you need any more information. Also, I made "force=true" the default option for 0_20_2-maintain, but if the committers feel that it is OK to "force=false" the default, I give an (uncounted) +1 to that approach. (If someone is using external entities or something like that they'll have to add "force=true" to the ant task to get the behavior they want, but it is probably a fairly rare use-case. Typically, Ant tasks, such as javac and xslt/style, use mod date dependencies by default.) Please let me know if there is anything else I can do to help. Regards, Sean -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- M. Sean Gilligan : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Catalla Systems, Inc. : 831-439-9568 x11 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
